Opening Statement by Minister for Foreign Affairs, Micheál Martin, TD at the Joint Committee on European Affairs, 12 March 2009
Joint Committee on European Affairs, 12 March 2009
General Affairs and External Relations Council Brussels, 16 & 17 March 2009
Opening Statement by Minister for Foreign Affairs, Micheál Martin, TD
Mr Chairman, Members of the Committee,
I welcome this opportunity to review the agenda for next week’s
General Affairs and External Relations Council, which will be the
third under the Czech Presidency. Before embarking on a
preview of next Monday’s meeting I want to take the opportunity to
give the Committee a brief read-out of the developments at the last
Council.
February GAERC Review
During February’s General Affairs session the Presidency briefed
Member States on its plans for the Spring European Council,
highlighting the need to make progress on the economic and
financial situation; and on energy and climate change. There was
broad support from Member States for the approach outlined.
I should point out that the discussions we have had at meetings of
Foreign Ministers complement the detailed treatment of these issues
by the Ministers for Finance, Environment and Energy in their
respective Councils.
They and their officials work at the various Council meetings to
ensure that Ireland’s perspectives are clearly articulated and that
our interests are reflected in the outcome of those Councils which
will feed into next week’s European Council discussions.
At GAERC, we had a detailed discussion of the European Economic
Recovery Plan. I informed the Council of our firm support for the
proposals brought forward by the Commission in January, which
includes provision for €100M for our East-West Inter-connector
project as part of a programme that is due to cost €5billion.
Considerable work has been done in the intervening weeks on this
programme of projects and the funding arrangements.
The Council also discussed the Eastern Partnership as part of the
preparations for the Spring European Council. The intention is that
the European Council will adopt a declaration on the Eastern
Partnership.
There are some tensions between those within the Union who want to stress either the eastern or the southern dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy. We take a balanced view of the European Neighbourhood Policy which we value as a means of bringing the countries concerned, whether on the Union’s eastern or southern borders, closer to the norms and standards of the Union.
The External Relations session in February began with a lengthy
discussion of Afghanistan, and it was agreed that this should be
followed by a further discussion in the margins of the European
Council next week.
This was followed by a brief discussion on the Middle East, which
focused on preparation for the donors’ conference in
Sharm-el-Sheikh on the reconstruction of Gaza. I briefed my
colleagues on my own visit to Syria and Lebanon in early February
and underlined my extreme disappointment at the lack of progress
regarding the humanitarian situation in Gaza and my concern about
further Israeli settlement construction.
Over lunch, we discussed the Western Balkans, specifically
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia. On Bosnia-Herzegovina,
there was general agreement that recent political developments are
of concern but that the transition from the Office of the High
Representative to an enhanced EU Special Representative represents
the best way forward, provided the necessary conditions are
met.
On Serbia, discussion focused on the report on the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia presented by Chief
Prosecutor Brammertz. It was agreed that a fact-finding
mission to Serbia to assess its co-operation to date, as suggested
by the Serbian side, would not add value and ran the risk of
cutting across the Chief Prosecutor’s mandate.
Finally, I briefed colleagues on my visit to Cuba last month.
I stressed that the current EU line on sanctions was the correct
one and underlined the strategic importance of the EU-Cuba-US
relationship.
I noted that I had raised human rights issues in a private meeting
with Foreign Minister Roque, that the exchange had been frank and
open and that the Cubans had engaged constructively.
Mr Chairman,
Turning to next Monday’s GAERC, there are a number of significant
items on the agenda, many of which follow on from last month’s
meeting. With your permission I propose to address the General
Affairs items first and then to turn to the External Relations
issues.
General Affairs
The General Affairs session will focus on preparations for the
Spring European Council and the European Recovery Plan.
No discussion is foreseen on the Lisbon Treaty at Monday’s
GAERC. The Spring European Council will, however, touch on
the Lisbon Treaty issue, but no substantive discussion is planned
as the main focus of the meeting will be the economic crisis and
climate change.
We have just received the latest draft conclusions for the Spring
European Council. The two key issues for discussion will be
climate change and the economic and financial situation.
The last couple of weeks have seen the publication of some
important documents on economic and financial issues:
the de Larosiere report, which made 31 detailed proposals on the
reform of financial market regulation, and
a Commission communication on the implementation of the report’s
recommendations.
The European Council is expected to provide the Commission with a
mandate to bring forward draft legislation based on the
recommendations of the De Larosiere report. These proposals
will require careful study in the months ahead. We expect
that the Ecofin Council will be tasked with bringing proposals to
the June European Council based on these documents.
There is now wide recognition that there will be a need for changes
in the governance of the international financial markets and
institutions. The downturn has exposed deficiencies in the existing
system.
We want to see this taken forward as a matter of urgency. Fixing
the world’s financial markets requires concerted international
action and the EU has a vital part to play in bringing that
about.
The Union has the economic weight and track record to be able to
make a real impact in improving the regulatory climate. I
hope that we can adopt the necessary legislation as swiftly as
possible. It is to be hoped that the April G20 summit will produce
agreement at a global level on improved regulation of financial
markets.
In respect of climate change, the Spring European Council will look
forward to the Copenhagen Climate Change Summit, which will be held
in December 2009.
The December European Council reached agreement on how the Union
will reduce its emissions by 20%. The Union is committed to
reductions of 30% as part of a comprehensive global agreement under
which other developed countries agree to adopt comparable emissions
reduction targets. Agreement at Copenhagen is critical if the
global community is to deal effectively with the threat posed by
climate change.
It is becoming clear that the emissions from emerging economies,
especially from such major emitters as China, Russia, India and
Brazil, will have to be curtailed as part of a broad international
agreement. It is clear that cuts in emissions from developed
countries alone will be insufficient to prevent global warming.
Major investment in emissions mitigation technologies in developing
countries will be necessary if they are to pursue their development
in a sustainable manner. This investment, much of which can
be undertaken on a commercial basis, will be crucial if vulnerable
communities in the developing world are to cope properly with the
challenges connected with climate change – for example, resource
depletion, desertification, and drought.
The Spring European Council will set out the basis for the Union’s
negotiating position at the Copenhagen meeting. We will be
supportive of an ambitious mandate which will pave the way for and
agreement leading to concerted international action on climate
change.
We are continuing to work with our EU partners on the financing
arrangements for the European Economic Recovery Plan. It is
important that we reach agreement on this plan at the European
Council. Otherwise, the Union’s credibility could well be
damaged. We will do all in our power to contribute to
an early agreement which will demonstrate the Union’s capacity
respond to the challenges posed by the current economic
crisis.
External Relations
Mr Chairman,
Turning to the External Relations session the first item on the
Agenda is the Western Balkans, which we also discussed last month.
It is expected that the discussion on Monday will centre on
Bosnia-Herzegovina and we expect that a new High Representative/EU
Special Representative will be appointed shortly.
Draft conclusions have been prepared which focus on the current
situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina and which call on the political
leadership there to engage on the reform agenda in order to make
real progress towards their European perspective. The Prud/Odzak
process which began in November 2008 is noted. The draft
conclusions reconfirm support for the transition from the Office of
the High Representative to that of a European Union Special
Representative, as soon as the five conditions and two objectives
set down by the Peace Implementation Council are met.
The EU continues to support the efforts of the political leadership
in Bosnia-Herzegovina to achieve progress on the issues that remain
to be resolved, and we strongly encourage Bosnia-Herzegovina to
achieve the key goal of progressing towards its EU
perspective.
The November GAERC considered that the ESDP mission in
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Operation ALTHEA should begin preparing for a
move from current duties to a downscaled training mission. On
Monday we will review this preparatory work and consider how we
might best take it forward.
Of course, members of the Joint Committee on European Affairs made
successful visits to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia from 2-5 March
2009. I understand you met with Parliamentarians and
political leaders in both countries and visited Camp Butmir to meet
the Irish troops and Garda Siochána who are serving with
EUFOR-Althea, EUPM and the OSCE.
We have a number of external relations items down for “possible”
discussion next Monday. Belarus is the first of these.
Relations between Belarus and the EU have been at a low level for
many years as a result of the very poor human rights record of the
Belarusian government. However, in recent times President
Lukashenko has given indications of wanting to improve relations
with the EU. But the EU has made it clear that the human rights
situation in the country must be improved for relations to
progress.
During 2008 there were slow and halting indications that this might
happen, including the release of political prisoners. Former
opposition Presidential candidate Alexander Kozulin, was amongst
the last to be released in August 2008. At the GAERC in October
2008 we decided that efforts to seek a positive way forward in the
EU-Belarus relationship should be promoted. Accordingly, in October
the Council decided to suspend the travel restrictions imposed on
certain Belarusian officials, including President Lukashenko.
On Monday, I expect that Conclusions will be agreed welcoming some
positive steps taken by the Belarusian government following our
decision in October to suspend those travel restrictions.
The Council will, however, express concern about indications of a
deterioration in the human rights situation in the country in
recent weeks and it will be made clear that further progress in the
EU-Belarus relationship is dependent on the previous positive steps
being continued. While the conclusions have yet to be finalised, it
looks likely that we will recommend a continuation of the
suspension of the travel restrictions for a further 6 months.
There may be a discussion on the EU-Belarus relationship,
particularly in light of proposals to include Belarus in the new
Eastern Partnership initiative. This is opposed by some given
Belarus’s mixed performance to date in moving forward on reforms.
While we continue to have concerns about the human rights situation
in the country and believe that the EU must continue to monitor
developments closely, Ireland considers that encouraging contacts
with the country is an important way to promote further reforms.
The issue of Sudan is provisionally on the agenda for the GAERC,
due to the International Criminal Court last week issuing an arrest
warrant against President Bashir. However, I think that there is
very broad consensus in the EU on our position, so there may not be
a need for discussion.
Ireland fully supports the work of the International Criminal
Court, which was created precisely in order to combat impunity for
the most serious crimes. We continue to call on all parties to
cooperate fully with the ICC in its work.
Ireland and the EU are deeply concerned by the Government of
Sudan’s decision to expel 13 NGOs from Sudan. Concern and Goal, the
two Irish NGOs which are directly active in Sudan, have not so far
been affected by the decision. Those who will suffer as a
result of this decision are among the poorest and most vulnerable
people in Sudan, and it is outrageous that the government should be
so indifferent to their plight. Ireland is monitoring the situation
closely, in order to assess any impact for Irish Aid’s humanitarian
funding in Sudan. The plight of the people of Darfur remains a
priority for us.
Over lunch, Ministers will discuss the question of Transatlantic
relations. We have since last year been looking at ways in which we
can deepen the EU-US relationship. Both France and the Czech
Republic have made this a priority for their respective
Presidencies. The EU has agreed to focus on four foreign policy
priorities where greater engagement with the US should be
encouraged. These are the Middle East, the effectiveness of the
multilateral system, Afghanistan/Pakistan and relations with
Russia. In addition, energy security, environment issues, economic
cooperation, and the global financial crisis will feature as topics
for greater engagement between the EU and the US.
At the European Council in December 2008, the EU reached agreement
on an Energy and Climate package. I welcome President Obama’s
decision to identify energy and climate policy as a key priority of
his administration. The closest possible EU-US cooperation is
essential, as we both face particular challenges in the field of
energy security. The full commitment of the US to a broad and
ambitious post-Kyoto agreement at the Copenhagen Conference in
December 2009 will be essential.
At the end of last week, Secretary of State Clinton met with my
Czech colleague. President Obama has accepted an invitation from
the Czech Presidency to travel to Prague for an informal meeting
with EU Heads of State and Government on 5 April. This will provide
an early opportunity for EU-US dialogue in preparation for what I
hope will be substantive outcomes at the June EU-US Summit.
The Presidency has also belatedly added the Middle East Peace
Process to the agenda for next Monday’s Council though it does not
appear at this stage that any substantive discussion is planned.
The EU Troika, including High Representative Solana, is due to meet
with the Egyptian, Jordanian and Palestinian Foreign Ministers in
Brussels next Sunday evening and the Council will receive a short
briefing on those discussions as well as an update on ongoing
Egyptian mediation efforts in the region. No Conclusions on this
item are foreseen.
Committee members will be aware that I attended the International
Conference in support of the Palestinian Economy for the
Reconstruction of Gaza on 2 March in Sharm-el-Sheik, Egypt. The
Conference demonstrated clearly the strong international support
which exists for the Palestinian Authority and for efforts to
reconstruct Gaza, following the recent conflict, with a total of
US$4.5 billion pledged by donors, including additional Irish Aid
assistance of €2.5 million for humanitarian and recovery efforts in
Gaza on top of our existing annual assistance of €8.6 million to
the Palestinian people.
Among those who addressed the Conference in Sharm-el-Sheik were
President Sarkozy, UN Secretary General Ban, President Abbas and
new US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. There was considerable
interest in, and a warm response to, Secretary Clinton’s
reassurance that the Obama Administration will pursue peace in the
Middle East with vigour and intensity.
However, as I emphasised in my own address, the key political
requirement at present remains ensuring the speedy and sustained
opening of border crossings into Gaza to facilitate the urgent
humanitarian and reconstruction efforts.
It is unfortunate that the ongoing political talks in Cairo to
secure a durable ceasefire in Gaza have not yielded greater
progress so far in this direction though the international
community must continue to do all it can to encourage both sides
and to support Egypt in its invaluable mediation efforts.
Similarly, greater progress on intra-Palestinian reconciliation
remains essential if the strong political commitment in
Sharm-el-Sheikh to assist the Palestinian economy and Gaza’s
reconstruction is to have any practical effect. An encouraging
start to the reconciliation talks was made in Cairo on 26 February
and the goal remains agreement on a national coalition government
for Palestinians by the end of March, in advance of the Arab Summit
in Doha.
The decision by Prime Minister Fayyad to announce his resignation
on 7 March, while one I very much regret given the achievements of
his government over the past twenty-one months, has been made with
a view to facilitating agreement on a national government by the
end of this month and can therefore be viewed as a hopeful
indicator of progress towards reconciliation.
I will again urge the Council to adopt as positive an attitude as
possible to this process and to any national government which
emerges since such reconciliation remains vital and we must judge
any new Palestinian government by its programme and actions, not
its composition.
The Council may also briefly consider the prospects for resumption
of overall peace efforts within the Middle East. In this regard,
the international community must continue to urge that the new
Israeli government honours existing commitments, including under
the Quartet Road Map, and clearly and unequivocally re-states
Israel’s commitment to a two-State solution and to the process of
direct negotiations with the Palestinian Authority initiated at the
Annapolis Conference.
Finally, while there will not be a discussion of Afghanistan at the
March GAERC, Council Conclusions will issue. As I mentioned
earlier, it is envisaged that Foreign Ministers will discuss
Afghanistan again in the margins of the European Council on 19
March.
One item for discussion at the European Council will be the
question of extending the mandate of the EU Special Representative
for Afghanistan, Mr Ettore Sequi, to cover Pakistan as well.
This move would reflect the mandate of the newly appointed US
Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard
Holbrooke. Since Mr Holbrooke’s appointment on 22 January, at
least three EU Member States, Germany, UK and France, have
appointed representatives covering both Afghanistan and
Pakistan. It appears that the intention is to form an
international Contact Group among the main players present in
Afghanistan.
Ireland supports the extension of the mandate of the EU Special
Representative on account of the close linkages between the
security and political situations in Pakistan and
Afghanistan.
Council Conclusions for the March GAERC are being prepared at
present. It is expected that they will re-affirm the
long-term commitment to working with the Government of Afghanistan
for the stability, reconstruction and development of the country,
including the EU commitment to assist police reform in Afghanistan
through its civilian ESDP Mission, EUPOL Afghanistan.
Conclusions will also cover the importance attached by the EU to
the holding of free and inclusive elections in Afghanistan in
August and the fact that the EU is ready to play its part in
assisting electoral preparations, including through the possible
deployment of an electoral observation mission, if security
conditions allow.
Mr Chairman,
That concludes my comments on the agenda for the General Affairs
and External Relations Council meeting on Monday next.

